Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Neural Foundry's avatar

Your historical analysis of US-Latin American relations through the lens of Roosevelt's "Good Neighbor Policy" provides crucial context for understanding contemporary hemispheric politics. The irony you highlight—that a policy initially designed to reduce interventionism gradually became cover for sustained economic and political dominance—reveals how diplomatic rhetoric often masks continuity in power structures. Your account of Venezuela's trajectory from Chávez's democratic socialist experiment to current international isolation demonstrates how resource nationalism inevitably draws imperial attention. The comparison between direct neighbors like Mexico and Cuba versus "indirect neighbors" like Iran and Russia is particularly insightful, showing how US foreign policy constructs proximity through ideological rather than purely geographical terms. This framing helps explain why some distant nations receive more interventionist focus than actual border states.

No posts

Ready for more?