Over the past months, a broad European movement has been in the news for trying to change EU migration policies. Led by the dynamic, charismatic and well-spoken duo of Martin Sellner (Austria) and Eva Vlaardingerbroek (The Netherlands), they have been calling Europeans to sign the Save Europe Act, a “petition” to be handed over to the Brussels Eurocrats. The fact that they were appealing to their fellow-Europeans in American English, is in itself a sad commentary on Europe’s utter cultural decay.
As could be foreseen, the Eurocrats refused to receive the Save Europe Act, (now signed by close to 700,000 Europeans) and the movement has led to nothing except a good amount of attention in the alternative media and scorn and ridicule in the legacy media. In part, the ridicule seems justified, because the initiative was made into a petition. The very term is wrong and self-deprecating to begin with. Given the fact that those Eurocrats are just a bunch of evil, corrupt, conceited criminals, one should begin by calling any formal initiative a “demand.” One might take one’s cue here from trade-unionism. Trade unions have demands, no petitions. And if those demands are not met, they go on strike. That is the only kind of language and action that Eurocrats understand.
The Save Europe Act aims at eliminating substantial numbers of non-European foreigners and sending them back to where they originally came from. Essentially, their goal is to stop and reverse the Great Replacement that has been underway for too long.
Currently, the EU has 450 million inhabitants, of whom about 50 million (more than ten percent!!) are Muslims. In 1957, when the EEC (European Economic Community, the EU’s precursor) was founded there were practically none in the six member states (France, West-Germany, Italy, Belgium, Luxembourg and The Netherlands). On a total of 165 million, there were at most some Muslim immigrants in France, The Netherlands, alongside the diplomats from Muslim countries.
After West-Germany in 1961 was forced by the US to sign a migration treaty with Turkey, allowing for the immigration of Turks, the number of Muslims began to grow. “Guest workers” from Turkey were soon followed by Moroccans and other North Africans. They came to work in mostly West-Germany, The Netherlands, Belgium and France.
After facing serious energy scarcity during the 1973 oil crisis in connection with the Yom Kippur War, the EEC (now enlarged with Britain, Ireland and Denmark) decided to talk with the Arab world so as to avoid that kind of problems in future. On June 7, 1975 those nine nations and most Arab nations signed the Strasbourg Resolution. Among its terms were the following: “regretting the relative neglect of the teaching of Arab culture and Arabic in Europe and looking forward to its development; hoping that European governments will help Arab countries to create the resources needed for the participation of immigrant workers and their families in Arab culture and religious life; calls on the governments of the Nine to approach the cultural aspect of the Euro-Arab dialogue in a constructive spirit and to give a higher priority to the popularisation of Arab culture in Europe.”
In other words, the EEC member states promised to create Arab and Muslim minorities, to support them and prevent their integration. As a result, Europe became even more attractive to North Africans and basically everyone from all over the Muslim world. Guest workers invited their families over, including wives, children, siblings, parents, uncles, aunts, cousins, helping the Muslim communities in Europe’s big cities to grow. Children born in Europe automatically received citizenship of the country where they were born. Since at home all were speaking Arabic (or another foreign language) the children going to school were at a disadvantage and most would never truly learn German, Dutch, or French.
Since German Chancellor Merkel in 2015 opened the borders of the country she had sworn to protect and defend, against hordes of foreigners eager to get a share of German wealth, millions of Muslim newcomers have come to the EU.
Today, there are millions of European-born Muslims, who are, of course, not real Europeans. All they are is children or grandchildren of African or Asian Muslims who happen to hold a passport of a European nation. Their main identity is usually Muslim (or Moroccan, Turkish, or whatever), while culturally, linguistically and ethically they remain un-assimilated. A majority prefer to remain that way, and the few who indeed adapt and assimilate are scorned by the migrant community. Therefore, for instance the many young Moroccan girls who succeed in assimilating and integrating will never find a husband: Moroccan men will either despise them for not wearing a headscarf, or feel inferior (because immigrant girls tend to do better at school and get better jobs), while European men will shun them, fearing to have to face their angry Moroccan relatives. Of all Muslim newcomers, it is only the Iranians who adapt, because they are generally middle or upper class. Numerous Turks are also middle class and they adapt as well. The Kurds among them frequently also integrate well, quite likely because their language, like Iranian, belongs to the Indo-European language family.
Most other Muslim immigrants, however, retain their allegiance to their country of origin, even if it is two or even three generations removed. Most of all, this also involves Islam which, in combination with the backward rural or urban lower class backgrounds most of them have, makes them actually unfit for life in Europe.
Although some people with an “immigration background” (which is the politically correct way to refer to such people) have made notable or even worthwhile contributions to their country of birth and/or residence, on the whole their presence as a distinct ethnic group is undesirable. Precisely because they continue to adhere primarily to the values, and ethical and behavioral standards of their country of origin. All over Western Europe, it is invariably the underprivileged and uneducated with an immigration background (North Africans, Somalis, Eritreans, Sudanese, Syrians, Afghans) that are leading in the crime statistics, especially theft, robbery, violence and rape. Since the victims are always real Europeans, such infractions can be considered attacks by invaders against the local population.
It should be admitted that these rather unwelcome settlers have taken more space than they should, partly also because the real Europeans have been massively abandoning their own traditional religious practices, that is to say especially Roman Catholicism and the various manifestations of Protestantism.
The strong presence of so many non-Europeans without the faintest desire to assimilate (deriving solace from Islam to compensate for their sense of frustration and inferiority for not wishing or being able to adapt) is becoming an ever more serious problem. Nevertheless, their presence is a welcome one for the evil elites governing the EU member states and the EU as a whole, because it comprises an essential element of their covert policy of divide and rule. After all, those evil rulers want everybody except themselves to be underclass. At the same time it is a sign that European Civilization has reached its final stages.
There are only two possible outcomes:
1. (Hardly likely) The working-class and lower middle class Muslim immigrants form an alliance with the native European working and lower middle classes, in order to oust the evil ruling elites in Germany, France, The Netherlands, Belgium, Sweden, Denmark and wherever else they constitute a sizable minority. This seems very unlikely and if such an alliance should ever be made, it will prove exceedingly difficult to make a revolution.
2. (Quite likely) The entirety of European Civilization will soon perish ignominiously due to the presence of the foreign invaders, in combination with other factors rooted in European history itself.
In order to mitigate the effects of point 2, it will be it necessary to ask most of those 50 million Europe-despising aliens to leave. Most will refuse to go of their free will, which will make the use of force inevitable. In other words, millions need to be kicked out. This is not really a problem, because many have double nationality anyway.
The Save Europe Act is not a serious endeavor, because it merely talks about “remigration.” This very term enrages the PC-crowd especially the many women that are part of it.
Therefore, for what it’s worth, most need to be kicked out. They will be more than welcome to take along with them as many of those sterile, over ripe PC-crybabies as they can.
Now, that’s a way to save Europe!
What about the "Chosen People" who, in the first place, aims to destroy Europe far more than illiterate invaders from Anatolia or the Maghreb? No word about that in the whole article. Hence, I regard it worthless, as it focuses only on Islam as a troublemaking problem. It may be a cause for trouble. However, as long as we deny the real cause for the problem, we will never gain any success.
If we decide to clean up our house, we should not spare the cause for all trouble.
The Save Europe Act is a worthy cause. But to save Europe, you must first eliminate those who are trying to destroy Europe and then remove the evil they have wrought.